Document Type

Journal Article

Department/ Unit

Department of Geography

Abstract

In the ten years since committing to clean energy transition, China has formulated a large number of policies and programs to achieve some very ambitious targets. This paper argues that the dearth of empirical studies concerning the implementation of these new policies and programs has created a knowledge gap between official policy documents, which are vague and lacking in specifics, and official policy outcomes, which are unreliable. In particular, the merits and limitations of flexible implementation with regard to desirable outcomes need to be debated and clarified. This paper calls for more empirical investigation in four areas as a starting point: (1) the nature and extent of flexibility in the implementation; (2) implementation strategies and their impacts; (3) factors that shape the behavior of local officials responsible for implementation; and (4) the relationship between the central-local relation and policy implementation.

Publication Year

2015

Journal Title

Energies

Volume number

8

Issue number

11

Publisher

MDPI

First Page (page number)

13255

Last Page (page number)

13264

Referreed

1

DOI

10.3390/en81112367

ISSN (print)

19961073

ISSN (electronic)

19961073

Link to Publisher’s Edition

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en81112367

Keywords

clean energy transition, policy, flexible implementation, China

Included in

Geography Commons

Share

COinS