Document Type

Journal Article

Department/Unit

Department of Religion and Philosophy

Abstract

In this review of Fan Ruiping’s book, I am concerned first of all about how representative his account of Confucianism/Ruism is in relationship to the multiform traditions associated with that teaching through more than two thousand years of its existence. Fan emphasizes pre-imperial forms of Confucian traditions, but neglects many alternatives from later sources. Secondly, his account of “familism” lends itself to questions related to the problem of revenge that is associated with traditional Confucianism. This raises further ethical doubts about the effectiveness of his reconstructed Confucianism within contemporary Chinese society. Finally, his “familism” appears to focus on extended family structures, but whether this is suitable and relevant for the structures of modern family transformations in mainland China is questioned.

Publication Year

2014

Journal Title

Dao

Volume number

13

Issue number

3

Publisher

Springer Verlag

First Page (page number)

395

Last Page (page number)

401

Referreed

1

DOI

10.1007/s11712-014-9386-x

ISSN (print)

15697274

Share

COinS