© 2015 Taylor & Francis. This paper responds to the revival of regionalism in the past two decades by showing that such a re-emergence is unequal. Comparing the practice of regional planning in China and England, this paper has demonstrated that the party-state in China and the liberal-democratic state in England have responded differently to this revival and developed different framework for regional administration and planning. These variations have not only elaborated planners' concern about planning practice in a ‘context of difference’ from social dimension to geographical variations, but also echoed geographers' affirmation that global trends take on different characters in local setting.
China, England, regional governance, spatial planning
Source Publication Title
Planning Practice and Research
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Link to Publisher's Edition
Chung, H. (2015). Unequal Regionalism: Regional Planning in China and England. Planning Practice and Research, 5 (30), 570-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1076135