Document Type

Journal Article

Department/Unit

Department of Computer Science

Language

English

Abstract

This article presents a study of EssayCritic, a computer-based writing aid for English as a foreign language (EFL) that provides feedback on the content of English essays. We compared two feedback conditions: automated feedback from EssayCritic (target class) and feedback from collaborating peers (comparison class). We used a mixed methods approach to collect and analyze the data, combining interaction analysis of classroom conversations during the writing process and statistical analysis of students' grades. The grades of students in both classes improved from pre-test to post-test but in different ways. The students in the target class included more ideas (content) in their essays, whereas the students in the comparison class put more emphasis on the organization of their ideas. We discuss our findings to identify strengths and weaknesses of our approach, and we end the paper by suggesting some directions for further research.

Keywords

Automated feedback, Collaboration, Decision tree learning, Design critiquing framework, English as a foreign language (EFL), Essay writing, Learning analytics (LA), Machine learning, Methods for using LA in EFL, Peer feedback

Publication Date

2017

Source Publication Title

Journal of Educational Technology and Society

Volume

20

Issue

2

Start Page

213

End Page

223

Publisher

International Forum of Educational Technology and Society

Peer Reviewed

1

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

Funder

The research design and data collection were carried out in the Ark&App project funded by the Ministry of Education of Norway

ISSN (print)

11763647

ISSN (electronic)

14364522

Share

COinS