Document Type

Journal Article

Department/Unit

Department of Education Studies

Language

English

Abstract

Learning English as a second language in the inner circle (ESL) is usually contrasted with learning it as a foreign language in the expanding circle (EFL). The notional landscape of ESL conjures up many positive images about ‘inner-circle pedagogy’, whereas, in fact, our knowledge about ESL activities and tasks is often unspoken, unanalysed and limited. In this paper, the researchers revisit this age-old problem by conducting bottom-up searches of a 154,681-word textbook corpus consisting solely of textbook instructional language. These sections declare task purposes and actions to be done, and are suitable for understanding ESL teaching practices. The study was conducted from an etic perspective of two researchers from the expanding circle. We retrace how we encountered a major impasse during this process, which then prompted a revision of our view of ESL. The Results section presents our corpus findings: There was an imbalance between the four skills, a strong emphasis on grammar, a large number of group/pair work requests and a narrowly-defined approach to literacy training. These findings add details to existing qualitatively-based ESL textbook studies. From expectation to realisation, this research calls for a preparedness in regard to enlarging our current understanding of what counts as ESL pedagogy.

Keywords

ESL, EAL, ESOL, Textbook pedagogies, Lexical collocations, Corpus linguistics, The four skills, Learning acts, Etic, emic viewpoints

Publication Date

2020

Source Publication Title

Ampersand

Volume

7

Publisher

Elsevier

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

DOI

10.1016/j.amper.2020.100066

Link to Publisher's Edition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2020.100066

ISSN (print)

22150390

Included in

Education Commons

Share

COinS